Seahawks Insider Blog

Atlanta Quarterback debate

I am going to start a debate here, something to do until the Seahawks have their afternoon practice session:

If there is nothing to play for in Atlanta in the last game of the season, and you want to rest the starters and keep everybody healthy, would you start Seneca Wallace at quarterback or would you let Charlie Frye play the whole game?

The arguments are pretty obvious: Letting Seneca go risks him getting injured, and then he may not be available for the playoffs -- though the flip side of that is if you need Seneca for a playoff game you are probably going to lose that game anyway. Seneca has put his time in this season, just like everybody else. Do you let him play and risk him getting injured, or let Frye start? Here's another option: Let Frye play quarterback and let Seneca start at wide receiver.

  Comments