A quick note at 11:04: I'm having some computer issues, apparently I somehow deleted the postgame reaction blog and this post was put in it's place.
So I go to watch Montana play a basketball game at UW, and I come back and there is a bunch of comments about thisreport
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to The News Tribune
from Pro Football Weekly saying that GM Tim Ruskell will not be retained next year.
I should have had it up earlier, that's my fault.
Look, PFW is a respected publication. But there is no by-line on the story and it's based on inside sources. You get a little nervous about giving something like this too much play.
So I guess posting the link and allowing the speculation or debate is fine. But until we get something confirmed either way, I guess you have to only look at it as a rumor.
How much credulity do you give this?
Most of you can rattle off a lengthy list of reasons why Ruskell should be out as a GM. I'm one of those people, but I'd be curious to wonder, what, if any reasons you could find for him to be brought back.