Politics & Government

Listen in on court hearing over Trump’s immigration order

The Seattle Times

This still image taken from United States Courts shows Judge James Robart listening to a case at Seattle Courthouse on March 12, 2013, in Seattle. On Friday, Robart placed a nationwide hold on President Donald Trump’s executive order, banning travel to the United States by migrants from seven Muslim-majority countries.
This still image taken from United States Courts shows Judge James Robart listening to a case at Seattle Courthouse on March 12, 2013, in Seattle. On Friday, Robart placed a nationwide hold on President Donald Trump’s executive order, banning travel to the United States by migrants from seven Muslim-majority countries. AP

Three appellate court judges will hear oral arguments Tuesday afternoon over President Trump’s executive order barring travelers from seven mostly Muslim countries.

Trump’s order was halted by Seattle U.S. District Judge James Robart on Friday, setting up a showdown between the courts and the Trump administration.

So, what can we expect?

▪ Oral arguments are scheduled to begin at 3 p.m.

▪ The hearing will be streamed live. Follow it here.

▪ Only audio will be available as the hearing is being conducted by telephone by judges in three cities.

▪ Three possible outcomes are expected: If the restraining order against President Trump’s order is upheld, for example, the Justice Department could either ask for a rehearing, seek a hearing from a larger panel of at least 11 judges or escalate the case to the Supreme Court.

▪ We already know what the Trump administration is arguing. In a response filed Monday afternoon, the government said judge Robart exceeded his authority and that Trump acted within his when he issued the order last month, citing national security.

▪ Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson argues that Trump’s executive order is a thinly disguised effort by the president to fulfill a campaign promise to ban Muslims from coming to the U.S. The state argued that a ban based on a religious litmus test would violate the Establishment Clause of the Constitution preventing the government from endorsing or discriminating against one religion over another.

  Comments