Re: “Don’t drink the Kool-Aid on Initiative 1634,” (TNT editorial, 10/10).
There’s no proof a soda tax will reduce obesity, but perhaps educating people in how to plan, shop and cook healthy foods will.
This could be done through the Health Department since lower-income people seem most at risk for a diet consisting of food that’s frozen, comes out of a can or eaten at a fast food restaurant.
Perhaps such a program could be linked to approval for food stamps.
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to The News Tribune
Your editorial mentions that some cities might adopt a soda tax to fund a variety of civic projects. This is exactly why I-1634 should be enacted. This loophole should be closed so that it doesn’t become another burden for taxpayers.
Soda taxes are touted as a sin tax that’s the cure for obesity linked to sugar-laden drinks. Exactly what evidence proves that obesity rates have fallen in areas where a soda tax is in existence?
This is just a backdoor way for cities to enact another tax burden with unspecified directives on how the money is to be spent.
There are more straightforward ways to fund civic projects.